Does centralized and industry-specific test automation for FMIs effectively solve multiple problems?
Yes, Unifits is a vendor, so when writing articles, we can quickly come under suspicion of promoting our solutions instead of writing neutral, serious and relevant articles — which, of course, we would never do. Still the question remains, how do we get an objective view on our products and whether they solve the problems we promise?
So, we thought about something different. What could be better suited than an intelligence that can access any available database virtually, relate it faster than anyone else, and then draw its conclusions with disarming honesty? This led us to the experiment of conducting an interview with ChatGPT.
Unifits: Please briefly summarize why FMIs should offer centralized, industry-specific testing solutions to their participants to better address current industry challenges.
ChatGPT: Financial Market Infrastructures (FMIs) should offer centralized testing solutions to their participants to enhance operational efficiency and resilience. The fast-paced and ever-evolving financial landscape poses significant challenges for FMIs, and automated, centralized testing solutions can mitigate these challenges. They provide a common platform for testing, reducing costs and time for participants, and can be tailored to meet industry-specific requirements. Industry-specific testing solutions offer a deeper understanding of the financial industry's needs and can be integrated with existing systems, providing a more comprehensive and effective testing approach.
(Unifits: It sounds like ChatGPT has learned the answer by heart, so we double-check right away with a counter question.)
Unifits: Is it true that centralized test automation does not bring any value to FMIs?
ChatGPT: No, it is not true that centralized test automation does not bring any value to FMIs. In fact, it brings significant value to FMIs in several ways. Centralized test automation can:
(Unifits: Now we are curious. Why did ChatGPT draw the conclusions it did?)
Unifits: Can you briefly compare the main advantages and disadvantages of manual or automated testing of software systems?
ChatGPT: Sure, here's a brief comparison of the main advantages and disadvantages of manual and automated testing:
Advantages of manual testing:
Disadvantages of manual testing:
Advantages of automated testing:
Disadvantages of automated testing:
In conclusion, the choice between manual and automated testing depends on the specific requirements and goals of each testing process. Both approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the best approach may involve a combination of both manual and automated testing.
Unifits: In this context, let's also look at the topic of so-called industry-specific solutions for test automation. How do these differ from generic solutions and what are the respective advantages and disadvantages?
ChatGPT: Industry-specific solutions and generic solutions are two approaches to test automation that differ in their scope and focus.
Industry-specific solutions are designed to address the specific testing requirements and challenges of a particular industry. For example, there may be solutions designed specifically for the financial industry, healthcare industry, or retail industry. These solutions are often tailored to the industry's specific regulations, standards, and processes, and they often include pre-built test cases and workflows that are specific to the industry.
Advantages of industry-specific solutions include:
Disadvantages of industry-specific solutions include:
Advantages of generic solutions include:
Disadvantages of generic solutions include:
In conclusion, the choice between industry-specific solutions and generic solutions depends on the specific requirements and goals of each testing process. Industry-specific solutions may be more effective and efficient for industries with specific regulations and standards, while generic solutions may be more flexible and cost-effective for testing scenarios that are not industry-specific.
Unifits: Which efforts are to be considered when FMIs are transitioning to ISO 20022?
ChatGPT: When FMIs are transitioning to ISO 20022, they should consider the following efforts:
In summary, FMIs should consider these efforts when transitioning to ISO 20022 to ensure a smooth and successful transition that meets the needs of their stakeholders and supports the stability and security of the financial system.
Unifits: Which of these efforts is usually underestimated?
ChatGPT: The effort that is often underestimated during the transition to ISO 20022 by FMIs is the testing and validation phase. This phase is critical to ensuring that the systems and processes are able to support ISO 20022 messaging and meet regulatory requirements.
Many FMIs underestimate the time, resources, and effort required for thorough testing and validation. This is because it involves testing not just the technical aspects of the systems, but also the business processes and user interactions.
It is important for FMIs to allocate sufficient resources and time for testing and validation, as this will help to ensure the smooth operation of their systems and processes, and prevent any potential disruptions during the transition to ISO 20022 messaging.
Unifits: Should clearing and settlement infrastructure providers offer their participants not only the production solution, but also test solutions to mitigate this problem?
ChatGPT: Yes, clearing infrastructure providers should offer their participants solutions for conducting tests for the following reasons:
In conclusion, offering solutions for conducting tests is an important aspect of providing a comprehensive clearing infrastructure solution that helps ensure its quality, reliability, and compliance with regulations.
Unifits: Please answer my previous question from an economic point of view.
ChatGPT: From an economic perspective, offering solutions for conducting tests as part of a clearing infrastructure can have several benefits:
Overall, centralized testing solutions can help reduce costs and improve the efficiency of the testing process for clearing infrastructure users, leading to increased economic benefits for all participants.
Unifits: Let's summarize what FMI operators should do in any case to minimize operational risk as much as possible, while increasing efficiency.
ChatGPT: As a financial market infrastructure (FMI) operator, there are several steps you can take to minimize operational risk and increase efficiency:
In conclusion, by implementing these steps, FMI operators can minimize operational risk and increase efficiency, while ensuring that they are operating in compliance with industry regulations and standards.
Unifits: One last question related to automated testing: would you say that it is more efficient and can solve even more problems if this is provided centrally?
ChatGPT: From an economic perspective, centralizing test automation can offer advantages in terms of efficiency and problem-solving. By having a centralized provider, the cost of implementing and maintaining the test automation solution is spread across a larger number of users, making it more cost-effective. Additionally, a centralized provider can offer a more comprehensive solution that can address a wider range of issues and meet the needs of a broader user base.
Moreover, centralizing test automation can lead to standardization and harmonization, as all users are using the same solution. This can result in increased efficiency, as there is no need for users to invest time and resources into developing their own custom solutions.
However, it's important to note that centralized test automation is not always the best option for every organization. In some cases, a more tailored, industry-specific solution may be more appropriate. Additionally, some organizations may prefer to have more control over their testing processes and therefore may opt for a decentralized approach.
Ultimately, the choice between centralizing or decentralizing test automation depends on a number of factors, including the specific needs and goals of the organization, the resources available, and the size and complexity of the systems being tested.
Unifits: … and if we focus on automated testing within an FMI with an industry-specific solution?
ChatGPT: When it comes to automated testing within an FMI using an industry-specific solution, there are several advantages to consider.
First, industry-specific solutions are tailored to the specific needs of the financial services industry. They take into account the unique requirements of the FMI and its participants, as well as the regulations and standards that apply to the industry. This allows for a more targeted and effective testing solution.
Second, industry-specific solutions can be more effective at identifying and mitigating potential risks in the FMI. They are designed to address the specific risks and challenges faced by the financial services industry, making it easier to identify and resolve issues before they become major problems.
Third, industry-specific solutions can also help reduce costs associated with testing. By using a solution that is specifically designed for the FMI, participants can avoid the time and resource costs of developing their own testing processes. They also have access to a more comprehensive and streamlined solution that can help minimize the overall cost of testing.
Finally, by using an industry-specific solution, FMI participants can be confident that they are meeting the regulatory requirements and standards that apply to the financial services industry. This helps reduce the risk of non-compliance and can improve the overall stability and security of the FMI.
While industry-specific solutions offer many benefits for FMIs, it's important to consider the potential disadvantages as well. These solutions may require a higher initial investment, as they are typically more specialized and therefore more expensive than generic solutions. Additionally, they may have limited capabilities, as they are focused on meeting the specific needs of the financial services industry.
In conclusion, while generic test automation solutions may have a wider range of capabilities and be more cost-effective, industry-specific solutions are better suited to meet the specific needs of FMIs and their participants. By carefully considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, FMI operators can choose the best solution for their needs and minimize operational risks while increasing efficiency.
Unifits: For us, the responses received from ChatGPT are plausible and as experts for transaction testing, the answers, for the most part, reflect our own views. For further questions or discussion about these topics and also if you want to find out more about the improvement of your quality assurance, please contact the author, Jonathan Misler.
Based in Munich, Germany, Unifits was founded in 2010 to simplify transaction testing and address the need for testing support related to ISO 20022 messages and processes. Unifits has made it its mission to let software handle complex, tedious, and frequently recurring testing tasks to ensure interoperability and operational resilience within FMIs.
No part of Central Bank Payments News may be reproduced, copied, republished, or distributed in any form or by any means, in whole or in part, without the express and prior written permission of the publisher, Currency Research Malta, Ltd.